Showing posts with label benefits of breastmilk. Show all posts
Showing posts with label benefits of breastmilk. Show all posts

Friday, April 20, 2012

hilary duff finds breastfeeding rewarding!

source: http://celebritybabies.people.com/2012/04/19/breastfeeding-hilary-duff-nursing-luca-is-rewarding/


Hilary Duff: Seeing Luca Thrive on Breastmilk Is Rewarding

Jennifer Wilson Photography

New mom Hilary Duff is splitting the parenting withMike Comrie, but there’s one aspect of tending to their son Luca Cruz that she has to handle herself.

“He’s really hands-on during the day,” the actress and singer, 24, who is the new spokesperson forJohnson’s Baby Cares initiative, tells PEOPLE of her husband.

“But at night, I’m the only one that can feed the baby. I wasn’t going to make him suffer just because I was having to get up.”

Though she leaves pumped milk for Comrie and her mother, who watches the baby while she takes a Pilates or spin class, Duff enjoys the time she spends nursing her 4-week-old son.

“It’s such a wonderful bonding time,” says Duff. “Just to have your baby thrive and knowing that you’redoing that and you’re responsible — it’s such a rewarding feeling.”

That same sense of responsibility since she entered into the world of motherhood motivated Duff to partner with Johnson’s Baby Cares for their Save the Children campaign, which will assemble, donate and distribute 5,000 Johnson’s Baby Care Kits that will provide families with baby care essentials immediately, during and after disasters.

“I’m involved in many different charities, but just becoming a new mom and when I heard about Johnson’s doing this, I was really inspired,” she explains.

“It’s such a great thing to have these kits be prepared for these new moms [so they are able] to take care of their babies. That’s all that’s been on my mind. The second that you have your baby, you’re like, ‘Okay, I’m 100 percent responsible for this.’”

At this point in Luca’s life, Duff says the relatively monotonous daily routine is broken up by frequent milestones.

“The day is exciting if he makes a new face or he gets to take a real bath instead of a sponge bath,” she shares.

“You know what was a big milestone? The belly button falling off. That was a huge one. And then I wanted to keep it but my husband was like, ‘No, that’s gross, you can’t keep it!’ I’m like, ‘I’m totally keeping it,’ and I secretly kept it.”

Duff adds, laughing, “But now it’s not a secret anymore. It’s in a Ziploc bag in the back of my makeup drawer. Luca’s going to think I’m a freak!”

Thursday, April 5, 2012

Breastfeeding update: 7 weeks

breastfeeding (and a healthy diet) has helped me lose 28 lbs.

my daughter was born at 8#6oz and is now 10lbs11oz
she was 20.5 inches long and has grown 3 inches.

oh yes, and has kept my girl healthy from all illnesses, despite daddy and i breaking down with bronchitis :)

thats all for now.

Friday, March 30, 2012

Normal Feeding: an article.

LOVE this. thought i would share. this blog is called Best is Breast. but reality...Normal is Breast should be its true title :) (but it doesnt rhyyyyymmmme! :] )

website source:

The Normal Newborn and Why Breastmilk is Not Just Food

What is a normal, term human infant supposed to do?

First of all, a human baby is supposed to be born vaginally. Yes, I know that doesn't always happen, but we're just going to talk ideal, normal for now. We are supposed to be born vaginally because we need good bacteria. Human babies are sterile, without bacteria, at birth. It's no accident that we are born near the anus, an area that has lots of bacteria, most of which are good and necessary for normal gut health and development of the immune system. And the bacteria that are there are mom's bacteria, bacteria that she can provide antibodies against if the bacteria there aren't nice.

Then the baby is born and is supposed to go to mom. Right to her chest. The chest, right in between the breasts is the natural habitat of the newborn baby. (Fun fact: our cardiac output, how much blood we circulate in a given minute, is distributed to places that are important. Lots goes to the kidney every minute, like 10% or so, and 20% goes to your brain. In a new mom, 23% goes to her chest- more than her brain. The body thinks that place is important!)

That chest area gives heat. The baby has been using mom's body for temperature regulation for ages. Why would they stop? With all that blood flow, it's going to be warm. The baby can use mom to get warm. When I was in my residency, we would put a cold baby "under the warmer" which meant a heater thingy next to mom. Now, as I have matured, if a baby is "under the warmer," the kid is under mom. I wouldn't like that. I like the kids on top of mom, snuggled.

Now we have a brand new baby on the warmer. That child is not hungry. Bringing a hungry baby into the world is a bad plan. And really, if they were hungry, can you please explain to me why my kids sucked the life force out of me in those last few weeks of pregnancy? They better have been getting food, or well, that would have been annoying and painful for nothing.

Every species has instinctual behaviors that allow the little ones to grow up to be big ones and keep the species going. Our kids are born into the world needing protection. Protection from disease and from predators. Yes, predators. Our kids don't know they've been born into a loving family in the 21st century- for all they know it's the 2nd century and they are in a cave surrounded by tigers. Our instinctive behaviors as baby humans need to help us stay protected. Babies get both disease protection and tiger protection from being on mom's chest. Presumably, we gave the baby some good bacteria when they arrived through the birth canal. That's the first step in disease protection. The next step is getting colostrum.

A newborn baby on mom's chest will pick their head up, lick their hands, maybe nuzzle mom, lick their hands and start to slide towards the breast. The kids have a preference for contrasts between light and dark, and for circles over other shapes. Think about that...there's a dark circle not too far away.

Mom's sweat smells like amniotic fluid, and that smell is on the child's hands (because there's been no bath yet!) and the baby uses that taste on their hand to follow mom's smell. The secretions coming from the glands on the areola (that dark circle) smell familiar too and help the baby get to the breast to get the colostrum which is going to feed the good bacteria and keep them protected from infection. The kids can attach by themselves. Watch for yourself! And if you just need colostrum to feed bacteria and not yourself, well, there doesn't have to be much. And there isn't because the kids aren't hungry and because Breastmilk is not food!

We're talking normal babies. Breastfeeding is normal. It's what babies are hardwired to do. 2009 or 209, the kids would all do the same thing: try to find the breast. Breastfeeding isn't special sauce, a leg up or a magic potion. It's not "best. " It's normal. Just normal. Designed for the needs of a vulnerable human infant. And nothing else designed to replace it is normal.

Colostrum also activates things in the baby's gut that then goes on to make the thymus grow. The thymus is part of the immune system. Growing your thymus is important. Breastmilk= big thymus, good immune system. Colostrum also has a bunch of something called Secretory Immunoglobulin A (SIgA). SIgA is made in the first few days of life and is infection protection specifically from mom. Cells in mom's gut watch what's coming through and if there's an infectious cell, a special cell in mom's gut called a plasma cell heads to the breast and helps the breast make SIgA in the milk to protect the baby. If mom and baby are together, like on mom's chest, then the baby is protected from what the two of them may be exposed to. Babies should be with mom.

And the tigers. What about them? Define "tiger" however you want. But if you are baby with no skills in self-protection, staying with mom, having a grasp reflex, and a startle reflex that helps you grab onto your mom, especially if she's hairy, makes sense. Babies know the difference between a bassinette and a human chest. When infants are separated from their mothers, they have a "despair- withdrawal" response. The despair part comes when they alone, separated. The kids are vocally expressing their desire not to be tiger food. When they are picked up, they stop crying. They are protected, warm and safe. If that despair cry is not answered, they withdraw. They get cold, have massive amounts of stress hormones released, drop their heart rate and get quiet. That's not a good baby. That's one who, well, is beyond despair. Normal babies want to be held, all the time.

And when do tigers hunt? At night. It makes no sense at all for our kids to sleep at night. They may be eaten. There's nothing really all that great about kids sleeping through the night. They should wake up and find their body guard. Daytime, well, not so many threats. They sleep better during the day. (Think about our response to our tigers-- sleep problems are a huge part of stress, depression, anxiety).

I go on and on about sleep on this site, so maybe I'll gloss over it here. But everybody sleeps with their kids- whether they choose to or not and whether they admit to it or not. It's silly of us as healthcare providers to say "don't sleep with your baby" because we all do it. Sometimes accidentally. Sometimes intentionally. The kids are snuggly, it feels right and you are tired. So, normal babies breastfeed, stay at the breast, want to be held and sleep better when they are with their parents. Seems normal to me. But there is a difference between a normal baby and one that isn't. Safe sleep means that we are sober, in bed and not a couch or a recliner, breastfeeding, not smoking...being normal. If the circumstances are not normal, then sleeping with the baby is not safe.

That chest -to -chest contact is also brain development. Our kids had as many brain cells as they were ever going to have at 28 weeks of gestation. It's a jungle of waiting -to-be- connected cells. What we do as humans is create too much and then get rid of what we aren't using. We have like 8 nipples, a tail and webbed hands in the womb. If all goes well, we don't have those at birth. Create too much- get rid of what you aren't using. So, as you are snuggling, your child is hooking up happy brain cells and hopefully getting rid of the "eeeek" brain cells. Breastfeeding, skin-to-skin, is brain wiring. Not food.

Why go on and on about this? Because more and more mothers are choosing to breastfeed. But most women don't believe that the body that created that beautiful baby is capable of feeding that same child and we are supplementing more and more with infant formulas designed to be food. Why don't we trust our bodies post-partum? I don't know. But I hear over and over that the formula is because "I am just not satisfying him." Of course you are. Babies don't need to "eat" all the time- they need to be with you all the time- that's the ultimate satisfaction.

A baby at the breast is getting their immune system developed, activating their thymus, staying warm, feeling safe from predators, having normal sleep patterns and wiring their brain, and (oh by the way) getting some food in the process. They are not "hungry" --they are obeying instinct. The instinct that allows us to survive and make more of us.

Wonders of Breastmilk! Part 1.



forgive me for being so offline; my girl has some colicky issues (i truly believe she needed her "4th trimester") and its been hard to get online to update!
so i jumped on to specifically post about something awesome.

the wonders of breastmilk.
i have long since heard and believed breastmilk is liquid gold.
not only does it protect your baby against SO many diseases, but when you get sick, your antibodies to the illness are passed to your baby, thus preventing them from getting sick, even with their weaker immune systems, they are still kept healthy!
while i hate to say Breastfeeding "reduces" risks, because i moreso believe NOT breastfeeding INCREASES risks, ill use the term reduce for the sake of this article.

Breastmilk, whether expressed or directly breastfed, reduces the risk of many a mallady.

the Natural Resource Defense Council (NRDC) says this on their website:
  • Breast-fed children are more resistant to disease and infection early in life than formula-fed children

  • Breast-fed children are less likely to contract a number of diseases later in life, including juvenile diabetes, multiple sclerosis, heart disease, and cancer before the age of 15

  • Mothers who breastfeed are less likely to develop osteoporosis later in life, are able to lose weight gained during pregnancy more easily and have a lower risk of breast, uterine and ovarian cancer

But there is SO much more. if you go deeper youll find there are more benefits than just those they named. in my studies, one of my training modules states this:
Human milk reduces the risk of developing the following medical conditions in infants and children:

  • Non-specific gastroenteritis
  • Severe lower respiratory tract infections
  • Atopic dermatitis
  • Asthma (young children)
  • Childhood overweight and obesity. Longer breastfeeding duration lowers the odd of the child being overweight 21. Additionally, breastfed infants regulate their food intake according to caloric needs.
  • Necrotizing entercolitis (NEC)
  • Lymphoma, leukemia, and Hodgkins
  • Type 1 and 2 diabetes
  • Acute otitis media
  • Late-onset sepsis in preterm infants
  • Urinary tract infection
  • Reduces morbidity and mortality rates 22
  • Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS). Exclusive breastfeeding offers stronger protective effects 18
  • Additionally, human milk enhances visual acuity
HOW INCREDIBLE. of course, im sure ive talked a little about this before.

but today i wanted to bring up another point. this isnt a study i read, and honestly i have not come to the read about this in any coursework on lactation, so i dont know any sources or sites other than personal accounts of friends or that ive read online. ive read in many a place from many a mother that some mothers use expressed breastmilk on minor injuries from cuts and scrapes, burns and sores. One friend of mine told me recently she used breastmilk on her sons blocked tear duct, and it healed! another told me that she would regularly use her breastmilk on bug bites, and it was used during a camping trip by her family to treat minor wounds. Google can tell you lots of stories about this phenomenom. while i havent heard medical professionals back this to me specifically, i thought i would try it out on my own.

During pregnancy with my son in 2008 i developed a rash under my arms that appeared to be acne like in nature. i had it for so long i cant remember how long it took after he was born before it began to clear up. clearly it was some sort of reaction of sorts. when i became pregnant with my daughter, it came back almost immediately. WITH A VENGEANCE. knowing it would stay for awhile i consulted my doctor who prescribed me antibiotics for this rash, what he guessed to be a staph infection.
it didnt work.
so i tried a few body washes with salicylic acid to combat the reash. no luck.
so then, i decided. Lets.Try.Breastmilk.
i was fully pumping until just recently, so i would use about .25 an ounce and slather it on the sores. i did this about three or four times.
these photos are a couple weeks apart.

here is the before.
the photo does not do it justice. both underarms were inflamed and the blotches were large and red. they would come to a small head of pus. quite nasty if you ask me.
here is the after :)
i reached out to my breastfeeding group for some personal accounts of breastmilk healing :)
ill update with their accounts soon.

of course i would be doing myself and you a disservice if i didnt say that these are merely personal accounts of regular ole womens, and you should consult your doctor before trying anything heal-like and medicine-y.

(word vomit)

:)

later breastfeeders.

Sunday, March 4, 2012

even the formula peeps know its true



i went t the store to grab some extra breast pads and milkbags and they happen to be on the same aisle as the formula. i got curious. i wanted to see the packaging and see if they were pressuring women to formula feed with marketing. i was very pleased to see that some of the major formula companies did not claim that formula was "as good as breastmilk" and even stated on the packaging that breastmilk was best. they did mention the formula was designed to be modeled after breastmilk, but it wasnt so misleading. now all mothers who read packaging can know breast IS best!





i was sad to see that one major company did not follow suit, at least in the three types i saw on the shelving. hopefully Similac decides to put something on their packaging stating the health benefits of breastmilk as well...


Monday, February 27, 2012

tips for pumping mamas!

on one of my mom boards someone posted a thread about tips for BFing moms. i reposted with some for pumping mamas, because we have some dilemmas too! heres what i posted. feel free to add any!

for the pumping mamas:

get a drink EVERY time...you will be thirsty.

make sure you have a stash of collection bottles and bags. you dont wanna run out.

consider a pumping station, the same spot every time in which to pump if possible, makes it routine for you, and for the older kids.

invest ina GOOD pump. i had 3 50$ automatic double breasted pumps with my son and they werent reliable. this time around, spending extra for the medela didnt seem so bad. youre saving an estimated 1500.00$ a year by not using formula not to mention the other costs, so spring for a good pump. my LC recommends Medela Pump in Style and the Ameda Purely Yours.

get yourself some good breast pads and some good creams. Lansinoh and Medela make great lanolin creams, and the first years has a cream lanolin free called Nipple Butter (is made with almonds and but oils...so read the ingredients for sensitivies).

if youre planning to try and go back to breast get a good LC to give you advice and support. it can be rough. my hospital gives unlimited visits for the first 30 days. ask yours!

along the same lines, look at some good breastlike bottles to avoid confusion or preference if you are using bottles. i like adiri, but im also using a medela specialneeds feeder (formerly known as haberman feeder) while we get through the tongue tie. Other options are Supplemental Nursing Systems with tubes and syringes to help baby until feeding@breast can be reestablished.

its hard to use a laptop for typing while pumping, at least for me, so i set my laptop up with netflix. my pumping usually takes me about 20 minutes and then a few extra to cream up and let some bmilk dry on the nips: just enough time to watch an episode of How I Met Your Mother :).

having pumped milk is fine and dandy to let daddy feed some too, but consider having his feedings be at night. and you can give day feedings to bub, so the awake baby knows milk comes from mom. may help when going back to breast if you can. besides, it's nice to be able to hold her close in a breastfeeding position, and look into her eyes :)

set alarms in the nighttime to pump. yes its hard on the brain and body, but your supply will thank you.

pumping doesnt have the same effect on the body as baby, so ask your doctor or LC about fenugreek or Blessed Thistle or Mothers Milk Tea if youre concerned about your supply. but dont try to fix what isnt broken :)

bringing baby in the room with you may help your release of oxytocin, by seeing baby's face :)

have support! I go to a group on Facebook (Breastfeeding-give it a go!) and i talk to those ladies all the time about my concerns and frustrations being attached to the pump. its nice to have support worldwide!

and remember, youre still giving breastmilk. youre making a really good choice in the midst of undesirable circumstances, be it going back to work or school, or a medical reason for not being able to have him or her at the breast. remember your reasons, you are succeeding!

Wednesday, February 22, 2012

BReastfeeding and Cancer Risk


Breastfeeding Can Reduce Cancer Risks



Children who are artificially fed or breastfed for only 6 months or less, are at an increased risk of developing cancer before age 15. The risk of artificially fed children was 1-8 times that of long-term breastfed children, and the risk for short-term feeders was 1-9 times that of long- term breast feeders.
Source: Davis, M.K. Infant Feeding and Childhood Cancer. "Lancet 1988

Others studies have shown that for both premenopausal and postmenopausal breast cancer, women who were breastfed as children, even if only for a short time, had a 25% lower risk of developing breast cancer than women who were bottle-fed as infants
Sources: Schwartzbaum, J. et al. An exploratory study of environmental and medical factors potentially related to childhood cancer. Med & Pediat Oncology 1991; 19(2): 115-21.

Freudenheim, J. et al. 1994 Exposure to breast milk in infancy and the risk of breast cancer. Epidemiology 5:324-331.

Website Source:
http://www.breastfeeding.com/all_about/all_about_cancer.html